Doors & controlled areas
Review door hardware, controllers, power, communications, and the boundary between public, staff, and restricted areas.
The right access, for the right person, with a record you can follow.
Discuss your projectShared credentials, unclear permissions, and disconnected door events make it difficult to know who should be where. A useful access system connects physical door behavior with the organization’s authorization process.
Review door hardware, controllers, power, communications, and the boundary between public, staff, and restricted areas.
Define how credentials are issued, changed, and withdrawn, with time schedules and role-based access appropriate to the operation.
Plan how operators review denied access, forced or held-open doors, visitor exceptions, and other events that need attention.
Assess readers, controllers, door hardware, identity workflows, and any video or visitor-management links. Emergency egress and life-safety interfaces need appropriate specialist coordination; access control must not be treated as a substitute for that review.
Include the relevant deliverables in the project scope, so both teams know what acceptance means.
That depends on credential technology, reader/controller support, licensing, and the security requirements. LFS reviews the installed equipment before making a recommendation.
No. PointGuard Access is an LFS-developed security operations product. A physical access-control system includes field hardware and controls; a product integration is a separate scope decision.
Required behavior must be agreed for each opening and supported by the hardware, power design, and life-safety requirements. It is part of the design and commissioning discussion, not a universal setting.
Start with the requirement. Equipment and integration decisions follow.